Columbia university racial preferences in dating

These and the GSS were used to generate independent variables that could be used to predict the extent to which race might matter.In the end, race didn’t matter that much, just to a statistically significant extent.First, let’s keep this in perspective, here are the correlations from the GSS for married individuals for several variables of note (I’ve filtered for whites here): Ethnicity – 0.40 Highest Degree – 0.55 Socioeconomic index – 0.32 I think it’s interesting to note that the variable which reveals meritocratic achievement has the highest correlation.

Secondly, I don’t actually buy their dismissal of different goals. You might ask here if the differences are simply due to objective differences in attractiveness.

We employ a Speed Dating experiment that allows us to directly observe individual decisions and thus infer whose preferences lead to racial segregation in romantic relationships.

Females exhibit stronger racial preferences than males.

It is obvious though that demographic segregation will shift away from a panmictic dynamic, and, I think marriage is frankly a higher bar than accepting the proposal for a date.

Here’s the chart that shows you who wanted who: Just inspecting the table, it’s pretty obvious what’s going on here. Not only are non-Asian women not impressed, but Asian women aren’t reciprocally racially discriminatory to level the playing field. Though there is some variation in the male acceptances by race, but as I said most of the differences were not statistically significant. This is their first linear equation: Decision We first look at the decisions of female subjects.


Leave a Reply